Is the No Child Left Behind Act working?

NCLB is reviled by those who decry standardized tests, yet the act has been working. The reading scores of 13-year-olds increased more in the first eight years of testing after NCLB than they did in the 28 years before it. In math, the scores of 13-year-olds increased roughly twice as fast after NCLB as before.

>> Click to read more <<

Thereof, did No Child Left Behind close the achievement gap?

Recently released results from the 2008 administration of the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP)1 suggest that the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is failing to close the achievement gap between minority and non-minority students.

Herein, how did the No Child Left Behind Act affect students? The controversial No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) brought test-based school accountability to scale across the United States. … We find evidence that NCLB shifted the allocation of instructional time toward math and reading, the subjects targeted by the new accountability systems.

Considering this, how does the No Child Left Behind Act affect students?

This law entitles students with learning disabilities to an education that meets their needs. The federal government has given states more leeway in measuring student progress in response to protests from parents of children with special needs.

How effective is NCLB?

We find that NCLB accountability increased the share of students performing at or above basic in math by 10 percentage points among 4th graders and 6 percentage points among 8th graders. Math proficiency rates among 4th graders also increased by 6 percentage points.

What is the main goal of No Child Left Behind?

The major focus of No Child Left Behind is to close student achievement gaps by providing all children with a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education.

What was the impact of the No Child Left Behind Act research paper?

Our results suggest that NCLB led to increases in teacher compensa- tion and the share of teachers with graduate degrees. We find evidence that NCLB shifted the allocation of instructional time toward math and reading, the subjects targeted by the new accountability systems.

Which of the following was a consequence of the No Child Left Behind Act quizlet?

No Child Left Behind gives states and school districts the flexibility to use funds where they are needed most. NCLB recognizes that local officials better know their community needs and how to distribute funds.

Why did many teachers criticize the No Child Left Behind Act?

One recurring No Child Left Behind Act Criticism is that it forces teachers to “teach to the test” in order to get students to pass standardized tests. These critics say that a consequence of teaching to the test is that teacher creativity and student learning are stifled.

Leave a Comment