Battery Reviews - DXOMARK https://www.dxomark.com/category/battery-reviews/ The leading source of independent audio, display, battery and image quality measurements and ratings for smartphone, camera, lens, wireless speaker and laptop since 2008. Wed, 22 Oct 2025 13:31:08 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 https://www.dxomark.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/logo-o-transparent-150x150.png Battery Reviews - DXOMARK https://www.dxomark.com/category/battery-reviews/ 32 32 Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G) Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/honor-400-smart-5g-x7d-5g-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/honor-400-smart-5g-x7d-5g-battery-test/#respond Fri, 17 Oct 2025 12:26:53 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=187233&preview=true&preview_id=187233 We put the Honor 400 Smart 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 6500 mAh 35W charger 6.77-inch, 720 [...]

The post Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G) Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Honor 400 Smart 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 6500 mAh
  • 35W charger
  • 6.77-inch, 720 x 1610, 120 Hz, TFT LCD display
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 128 GB + 4 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G)
168
battery
217
Autonomy
243

254

171

195

200

211

121
Charging
98

224

149

212

120

205

167

194

Key performances

Charging Time
4 days 3h
Battery life
Charging Time
0h60
80% Charging time
Charging Time
1h27
Full charging time
Quick Boost
6h28 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Outstanding overall autonomy performances, exceeding 4 days of usage
  • Well optimized power consumption for most use cases

Cons

  • Long charging time
  • UI slightly over estimating the remaining battery level displaying 20% when the actual charge is lower

The HONOR 400 Smart 5G has claimed the top spot in our database, thanks to its outstanding autonomy and overall efficiency. Powered by a large 6500 mAh battery, the device delivers exceptional battery life, exceeding four days under moderate usage (around 4 hours per day). It offers solid endurance across a wide range of use cases, both stationary and on the move. In particular, it excels in gaming, video streaming, and music playback, delivering up to 18 hours, 30 hours, and 77 hours of usage, respectively. As a result, the HONOR 400 Smart 5G proves to be a reliable travel companion and ranks No. 1 in our autonomy sub-score.

In contrast to its excellent battery life, the device delivers average charging performance, a trade-off expected in this price segment. The combination of a high-capacity battery and a modest 35W maximum charging power results in longer charging times: approximately one hour to reach 80%, and about 1 hour and 27 minutes for a full charge. However, thanks to its impressive efficiency, even a quick 5-minute top-up can recover around 6 hours and 30 minutes of usage, placing it above average in our database for quick boosts.

The HONOR 400 Smart 5G also scores highly in our efficiency sub-score, demonstrating low power consumption across various tested applications—a testament to its strong software optimization. That said, the overall charging efficiency was only average, and we observed slightly elevated residual power consumption when the device was plugged in or unplugged. Nevertheless, the HONOR 400 Smart 5G stands out as a highly optimized, battery-focused smartphone that excels in real-world endurance.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G) 6500mAh 35W
(not included)
- TFT LCD
720 x 1610
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
Motorola Edge 60 Pro 6000mAh 90W
(not included)
15W pOLED
1220 x 2712
MediaTek Dimensity 8350
Oppo Find X8 5630mAh 80W
(included)
50W AMOLED
1256 x 2760
MediaTek Dimensity 9400

Autonomy

217

Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G)

230

Honor X7d (400 Smart)
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
139h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
99h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
63h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

243

Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G)

254

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

171

Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G)

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

200

Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G)

211

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

121

Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G)

218

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
42%
in 30 min
0h60
0 - 80%
1h27
Full charge
Wireless
Wireless
0%
in 30 min
0h00
0 - 80%
0h00
Full charge

Full charge

98

Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G)

224

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
The time to full charge chart breaks down the necessary time to reach 80%, 100% and full charge.

Quick boost

149

Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G)

212

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

150

Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G)

160

Honor X7d (400 Smart)
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G)
3.6 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

120

Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G)

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

167

Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G)

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G) Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/honor-400-smart-5g-x7d-5g-battery-test/feed/ 0 Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless BATTERY BATTERY
Honor X7d (400 Smart) Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/honor-x7d-400-smart-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/honor-x7d-400-smart-battery-test/#respond Fri, 17 Oct 2025 12:26:16 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=187235&preview=true&preview_id=187235 We put the Honor X7d (400 Smart) through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 6500 mAh 35W charger 6.77-inch, 720 [...]

The post Honor X7d (400 Smart) Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Honor X7d (400 Smart) through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 6500 mAh
  • 35W charger
  • 6.77-inch, 720 x 1610, 120 Hz, TFT LCD display
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 128 GB + 6 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Honor X7d (400 Smart)
168
battery
230
Autonomy
254

Best

190

195

211

Best

108
Charging
81

224

144

212

127

205

180

194

Key performances

Charging Time
4 days 13h
Battery life
Charging Time
1h10
80% Charging time
Charging Time
1h36
Full charging time
Quick Boost
5h56 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Outstanding overall autonomy performances
  • Well optimized power consumption for most use cases

Cons

  • Long charging time
  • UI slightly over estimating the remaining battery level displaying 20% when the actual charge is lower

The HONOR X7d (400 Smart), just like its 5G sibling, achieves top scores in our database, thanks to its remarkable autonomy and strong efficiency. These excellent results allow it to secure the best sub-scores in both categories, confirming HONOR’s focus on battery-centered devices.

Equipped with a large 6500 mAh battery, the HONOR X7d delivers outstanding endurance, easily lasting more than four days under moderate use. It performs particularly well in gaming and video playback scenarios, where its low power consumption ensures consistent results. Compared to the HONOR X7d 5G, the 4G version stands out with even better autonomy and overall efficiency, making it the stronger choice for those who prioritize long-lasting performance.

The charging performances are average, with about 1 hour and 10 minutes to reach 80%, and a full recharge 1 hour and 36 minutes. That said, a short 5-minute top-up still provides around 6 hours of usage, which remains practical for quick boosts when necessary.

Overall, the HONOR X7d confirms itself as a highly optimized endurance device, with best-in-class results for autonomy and efficiency, and a clear advantage for users seeking maximum battery life over faster charging.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Honor 400 Smart 5G (x7d 5G) 6500mAh 35W
(not included)
- TFT LCD
720 x 1610
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
Motorola Edge 60 Pro 6000mAh 90W
(not included)
15W pOLED
1220 x 2712
MediaTek Dimensity 8350
Oppo Find X8 5630mAh 80W
(included)
50W AMOLED
1256 x 2760
MediaTek Dimensity 9400

Autonomy

230

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

Best

How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
158h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
109h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
67h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

254

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

Best

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

190

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

211

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

Best

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

108

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

218

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
34%
in 30 min
1h10
0 - 80%
1h36
Full charge
Wireless
Wireless
0%
in 30 min
0h00
0 - 80%
0h00
Full charge

Full charge

81

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

224

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
The time to full charge chart breaks down the necessary time to reach 80%, 100% and full charge.

Quick boost

144

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

212

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

160

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

Best

How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Honor X7d (400 Smart)
3.3 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

127

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

180

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Honor X7d (400 Smart) Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/honor-x7d-400-smart-battery-test/feed/ 0 Best Best Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Best Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Best Best Wired Wireless BATTERY BATTERY Best
Motorola edge 2025 Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/motorola-edge-2025-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/motorola-edge-2025-battery-test/#respond Tue, 27 May 2025 13:00:21 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=184480&preview=true&preview_id=184480 We put the Motorola Edge – 2025 through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 5200 mAh 68W charger (not included) [...]

The post Motorola edge 2025 Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Motorola Edge – 2025 through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 5200 mAh
  • 68W charger (not included)
  • 6.7-inch, 1220 x 2712, 120 Hz, OLED display
  • MediaTek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 256 GB + 8 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Motorola Edge 2025
152
battery
162
Autonomy
166

254

151

195

161

211

142
Charging
123

224

164

212

117

205

158

194

Key performances

Charging Time
3 days
Battery life
Charging Time
0h40
80% Charging time
Charging Time
1h04
Full charging time
Quick Boost
8h23 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Good autonomy for most use cases, delivering 72 hours of battery life on a single charge
  • Strong power optimization with low discharge currents for most use cases

Cons

  • Below average wired charging power efficiency
  • Noticeable delay between the indicator showing 100% and the actual completion of charging for both wired and wireless methods

The Motorola edge 2025 secured a spot in the top 10 of our battery performance ranking, offering well-balanced results across all testing criteria.

It delivers impressive overall autonomy, allowing users to enjoy more than three days of usage on a single charge under moderate conditions (with an average of four hours of active use / day). The device performs strongly across most use cases and is especially well-suited for extended video streaming and gaming sessions.

On the charging front, the device includes a 68W charger and achieved a full charge in just over an hour. Wireless charging, a noteworthy feature at this price point, took over two hours to fully recharge the battery. It’s worth noting that regardless of the charging method, the user interface indicates 100% before the battery is actually fully charged, which occurs approximately 10 minutes later. For those needing a quick boost, a 5-minute wired top-up provided up to 8 hours of additional autonomy.

Regarding charging efficiency, the Motorola edge 2025 showed below-average results, largely due to a less effective charger. However, in terms of power consumption, it excelled across most tested scenarios, highlighting strong power optimization and an efficiently designed system.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Motorola Edge 60 Pro 6000mAh 90W
(not included)
15W pOLED
1220 x 2712
MediaTek Dimensity 8350
Honor Magic7 Lite 6600mAh 66W
(included)
- AMOLED
1224 x 2700
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
Oppo Find X8 5630mAh 80W
(included)
50W AMOLED
1256 x 2760
MediaTek Dimensity 9400

Autonomy

162

Motorola Edge 2025

230

Honor X7d (400 Smart)
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
103h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
72h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
44h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

166

Motorola Edge 2025

254

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

151

Motorola Edge 2025

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

161

Motorola Edge 2025

211

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

142

Motorola Edge 2025

218

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
61%
in 30 min
0h40
0 - 80%
1h04
Full charge
Wireless
Wireless
25%
in 30 min
1h47
0 - 80%
2h28
Full charge

Full charge

123

Motorola Edge 2025

224

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Power consumption and battery level during wireless full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
Time to full charge

Quick boost

164

Motorola Edge 2025

212

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

143

Motorola Edge 2025

160

Honor X7d (400 Smart)
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Motorola Edge 2025
3.7 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

117

Motorola Edge 2025

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

158

Motorola Edge 2025

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Motorola edge 2025 Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/motorola-edge-2025-battery-test/feed/ 0 Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless Wired Wireless
Motorola Edge 60 Pro Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/motorola-edge-60-pro-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/motorola-edge-60-pro-battery-test/#respond Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:05:25 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=184299&preview=true&preview_id=184299 We put the Motorola Edge 60 Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 6000 mAh 90W charger (not included) [...]

The post Motorola Edge 60 Pro Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Motorola Edge 60 Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 6000 mAh
  • 90W charger (not included)
  • 6.67-inch, 1220 x 2712, 120 Hz, OLED display
  • MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (4 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 512 GB + 12 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.


Motorola Edge 60 Pro
164
battery
183
Autonomy
194

254

175

195

171

211

149
Charging
135

224

164

212

127

205

149

194

Key performances

Charging Time
3 days 11h
Battery life
Charging Time
0h32
80% Charging time
Charging Time
0h53
Full charging time
Quick Boost
8h23 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Very good autonomy for most use cases, delivering more than 82 hours of battery life on a single charge
  • Fast and efficient charging, reaching 80% capacity in just 32 minutes
  • Strong power optimization with low discharge currents accross most use cases

Cons

  • Slightly below average wireless charging performance

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads our battery ranking, offering an exceptional overall experience with standout autonomy performance.

With up to 3 days of battery life under moderate usage, the device delivers impressive endurance, lasting 83 hours without needing a recharge. It excels across a range of use cases, especially during video streaming and gaming sessions, offering up to 26 and 14 hours of usage respectively.

This strong autonomy is paired with an efficient charging experience, supported by its 90W charger. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro reaches 80% charge in just 32 minutes and can gain approximately 8 hours of use from a quick 5-minute top-up. In addition to fast wired charging, it supports wireless charging for added convenience, reaching 80% capacity in under two hours.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro also scored highly in our efficiency tests, thanks to well-controlled discharge currents across nearly all use scenarios, reflecting optimized power management.

In addition to its top position in the DXOMARK Battery ranking, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms devices in the High End class (priced between €400and €600), thanks especially to its superior battery life.

 

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Motorola Edge 60 Pro 6000mAh 90W
(not included)
15W pOLED
1220 x 2712
MediaTek Dimensity 8350
Honor X9c 6600mAh 66W
(not included)
- AMOLED
1224 x 2700
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
Oppo Find X8 5630mAh 80W
(included)
50W AMOLED
1256 x 2760
MediaTek Dimensity 9400

Autonomy

183

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

230

Honor X7d (400 Smart)
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
117h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
83h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
52h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

194

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

254

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

175

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

171

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

211

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

149

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

218

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
76%
in 30 min
0h32
0 - 80%
0h53
Full charge
Wireless
Wireless
21%
in 30 min
1h55
0 - 80%
2h43
Full charge

Full charge

135

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

224

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Power consumption and battery level during wireless full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
Time to full charge

Quick boost

164

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

212

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

141

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

160

Honor X7d (400 Smart)
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Motorola Edge 60 Pro
4.4 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

127

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

149

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Motorola Edge 60 Pro Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/motorola-edge-60-pro-battery-test/feed/ 0 Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless Wired Wireless
Xiaomi 14T Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/xiaomi-14t-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/xiaomi-14t-battery-test/#respond Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:08:29 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=181050 We put the Xiaomi 14T through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 5000 mAh 67W charger (included) 6.67-inch, 1220 x [...]

The post Xiaomi 14T Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Xiaomi 14T through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 5000 mAh
  • 67W charger (included)
  • 6.67-inch, 1220 x 2712, 144 Hz, OLED display
  • MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra (4 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 512 GB + 12 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
116
battery
107
Autonomy
98

254

118

195

117

211

138
Charging
135

224

142

212

131

205

93

194

Key performances

Charging Time
2 days 3h
Battery life
Charging Time
0h28
80% Charging time
Charging Time
0h46
Full charging time
Quick Boost
5h54 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Accurate battery gauge during a full charge
  • Average 6 hours of autonomy recovered from a 5-minute charge

Cons

  • High discharge currents when using device on the go and during the typical usage scenario evaluation

The Xiaomi 14T delivered a mixed battery experience, with average autonomy, poor efficiency, but good charging.

The device demonstrated good autonomy in the on-the-go use cases and in gaming. However, the performance was below expectations in the home/office use cases. It still delivered more than 2 days of autonomy when used moderately, which is slightly above average in the premium segment.

The device reached a measured full charge in 46 minutes. The Xiaomi 14T’s battery gauge was quite accurate, with the screen’s UI showing 100% after 44 minutes. A quick 5-minute battery charge recovered an average of 6 hours of autonomy.

The efficiency of the device was rather poor, with high discharge currents, especially during our home/office test case.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Xiaomi 14T 5000mAh 67W
(not included)
- OLED
1220 x 2712
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
Xiaomi 13T 5000mAh 67W
(not included)
- OLED
1220 x 2712
Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra
Oppo Reno12 5000mAh 80W
(not included)
- AMOLED
1080 x 2412
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 - Energy

Autonomy

107

Xiaomi 14T

230

Honor X7d (400 Smart)
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
73h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
51h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
32h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

98

Xiaomi 14T

254

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

118

Xiaomi 14T

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

117

Xiaomi 14T

211

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

138

Xiaomi 14T

218

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
84%
in 30 min
0h28
0 - 80%
0h46
Full charge

Full charge

135

Xiaomi 14T

224

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
The time to full charge chart breaks down the necessary time to reach 80%, 100% and full charge.

Quick boost

142

Xiaomi 14T

212

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

104

Xiaomi 14T

160

Honor X7d (400 Smart)
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Xiaomi 14T
4.9 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

131

Xiaomi 14T

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

93

Xiaomi 14T

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Xiaomi 14T Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/xiaomi-14t-battery-test/feed/ 0 Xiaomi 14T Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Wired BATTERY BATTERY
Oppo Find X8 Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/oppo-find-x8-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/oppo-find-x8-battery-test/#respond Wed, 08 Jan 2025 08:00:22 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=180963 We put the Oppo Find X8 through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 5630 mAh 80W charger (included) 6.59-inch, 1256 [...]

The post Oppo Find X8 Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Oppo Find X8 through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 5630 mAh
  • 80W charger (included)
  • 6.59-inch, 1256 x 2760, 120 Hz, OLED display
  • MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 1000 GB + 16 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Oppo Find X8
Oppo Find X8
156
battery
169
Autonomy
201

254

125

195

145

211

148
Charging
136

224

160

212

144

205

133

194

Key performances

Charging Time
3 days 3h
Battery life
Charging Time
0h34
80% Charging time
Charging Time
0h55
Full charging time
Quick Boost
8h05 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Impressive autonomy with more than 3 days of moderate use on a single charge
  • Good autonomy with cellular connectivity when streaming video and music
  • Good overall charge efficiency

Cons

  • High residual power consumption after a full charge when the smartphone is still connected to the charger
  • High residual power consumption with wireless charger.

The Oppo Find X8 provided an overall good battery experience, with strong autonomy and good power efficiency.

The Find X8’s autonomy was higher than average, lasting slightly more than three days on a single charge when used moderately.

The device reached a full charge in 55 minutes using a wired connection, while wireless charging took 1 hour and 19 minutes to reach full capacity.

The device made efficient use of its power, but efficiency was held back by the high residual power consumption that was observed at the end of a full charge, whether using a wired or wireless charger.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Oppo Find X8 5630mAh 80W
(included)
50W AMOLED
1256 x 2760
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Xiaomi 14 4610mAh 90W
(not included)
50W AMOLED
1200 x 2670
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos) 4000mAh 25W
(not included)
15W Dynamic AMOLED 2X
1080 x 2340
Samsung Exynos 2400

Autonomy

169

Oppo Find X8

230

Honor X7d (400 Smart)
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
107h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
75h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
48h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

201

Oppo Find X8

254

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

125

Oppo Find X8

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

145

Oppo Find X8

211

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

148

Oppo Find X8

218

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
72%
in 30 min
0h34
0 - 80%
0h55
Full charge
Wireless
Wireless
41%
in 30 min
0h57
0 - 80%
1h19
Full charge

Full charge

136

Oppo Find X8

224

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Power consumption and battery level during wireless full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
Time to full charge

Quick boost

160

Oppo Find X8

212

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

137

Oppo Find X8

160

Honor X7d (400 Smart)
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Oppo Find X8
4.1 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

144

Oppo Find X8

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

133

Oppo Find X8

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Oppo Find X8 Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/oppo-find-x8-battery-test/feed/ 0 Oppo Find X8 Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless Wired Wireless
Honor Magic7 Lite Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/honor-magic7-lite-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/honor-magic7-lite-battery-test/#respond Tue, 07 Jan 2025 12:37:51 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=181054 We put the Honor Magic7 Lite through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 6600 mAh 66W charger (not included) 6.78-inch, [...]

The post Honor Magic7 Lite Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Honor Magic7 Lite through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 6600 mAh
  • 66W charger (not included)
  • 6.78-inch, 1224 x 2700, 120 Hz, OLED display
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen1 (SM6450) (4 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 256 GB + 8 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Honor Magic7 Lite
Honor Magic7 Lite
164
battery
197
Autonomy
205

254

183

195

191

211

132
Charging
114

224

153

212

125

205

154

194

Key performances

Charging Time
3 days 17h
Battery life
Charging Time
0h42
80% Charging time
Charging Time
1h10
Full charging time
Quick Boost
6h58 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Excellent autonomy in all our test cases, especially video and gaming
  • Good charging experience for such a massive battery

Cons

  •  Inaccurate battery power display: when 15.8% of autonomy is left, UI displays 20%

The Honor Magic7 Lite’s battery achieved a top score ex aequo in our database thanks to a powerful performance in autonomy.

Equipped with a serious 6600 mAh battery, the Honor Magic7 Lite, which is marketed as Honor X9c in some regions of the world, exhibited an impressive battery life of just over three and a half days under moderate usage.

The device gained 12 hours of autonomy over the previous model, the Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh), lasting 89 hours without needing to recharge. Across most test cases, particularly in video streaming and gaming, the Honor Magic7 Lite demonstrated exceptional autonomy, also achieving the No. 1 spot in our autonomy sub-score.

Charging performance was also robust, despite the massive capacity to charge, thanks to the 66W charger. The Honor Magic7 Lite reached 80% of a full charge in about 42 minutes, and recovered almost 7 hours of autonomy in a quick 5-minute battery top-up, surpassing its predecessor X9b. Despite those impressive charging times, the Magic7 Lite was still behind the charging time of the Oppo Find X7 Ultra, which achieved 80% of a full charge in half the time (20 minutes) on a 100W charger.

The Honor Magic7 Lite also ranked high in our efficiency subscore, thanks to its consistently low discharging current across nearly all individual test cases, especially video streaming and gaming. The efficiency of a full charge was however just average, and we measured relatively high residual power drains from the grid after the end of a full charge.

Compared to other devices in the Advanced segment, the Honor Magic7 Lite showcased exceptional overall battery life and a high degree of optimization, surpassing its predecessor and matching the top score globally, and of course, in its segment.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Honor Magic7 Lite 6600mAh 66W
(included)
- AMOLED
1224 x 2700
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh) 5800mAh 35W
(included)
- AMOLED
1200 x 2652
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
Oppo Find X7 Ultra 5000mAh 100W
(not included)
50W LTPO AMOLED
1440 x 3168
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3

Autonomy

197

Honor Magic7 Lite

230

Honor X7d (400 Smart)
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
128h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
89h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
55h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

205

Honor Magic7 Lite

254

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

183

Honor Magic7 Lite

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

191

Honor Magic7 Lite

211

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

132

Honor Magic7 Lite

218

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
59%
in 30 min
0h42
0 - 80%
1h10
Full charge

Full charge

114

Honor Magic7 Lite

224

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
The time to full charge chart breaks down the necessary time to reach 80%, 100% and full charge.

Quick boost

153

Honor Magic7 Lite

212

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

144

Honor Magic7 Lite

160

Honor X7d (400 Smart)
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Honor Magic7 Lite
4.2 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

125

Honor Magic7 Lite

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

154

Honor Magic7 Lite

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Honor Magic7 Lite Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/honor-magic7-lite-battery-test/feed/ 0 Honor Magic7 Lite Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Wired BATTERY BATTERY
Xiaomi 14T Pro Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/xiaomi-14t-pro-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/xiaomi-14t-pro-battery-test/#respond Mon, 06 Jan 2025 13:37:55 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=181048 We put the Xiaomi 14T Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 5000 mAh 120W charger (not included) 6.67-inch, [...]

The post Xiaomi 14T Pro Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Xiaomi 14T Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 5000 mAh
  • 120W charger (not included)
  • 6.67-inch, 1220 x 2712, 144 Hz, OLED display
  • MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 512 GB + 12 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Xiaomi 14T Pro
Xiaomi 14T Pro
128
battery
113
Autonomy
107

254

127

195

118

211

167
Charging
166

224

169

212

140

205

96

194

Key performances

Charging Time
2 days 6h
Battery life
Charging Time
0h21
80% Charging time
Charging Time
0h41
Full charging time
Quick Boost
9h01 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Excellent efficiency during a wireless charge
  • Good autonomy in gaming
  • Excellent wired and wireless charging speeds to reach 80% of a full charge

Cons

  • Rather high discharge currents, especially in the   Home/Office use cases
  • Poor autonomy when streaming music on a  cellular connection

The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s solid battery performance is mainly thanks to its excellent charging experience, which is both fast and efficient.

A single charge gave the device enough power to operate for more than two days when used moderately, which was below average when compared with the other phones in our global database, but slightly above average when compared with devices in the premium segment. The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s autonomy was stronger than other phones in its segment when gaming and watching videos, but it was barely average in other usages.

The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s charging experience was outstanding, taking 21 minutes to reach 80% of a full charge using the 120W wired charger, and 35 minutes with the 50W wireless charger. A quick 5-minute battery charge recovered 9 hours of autonomy on average, which puts the Xiaomi 14T Pro among the best performers.

Although the device’s wired and wireless charging efficiencies were good, the overall efficiency score was impacted by rather high discharge currents in most use cases except gaming and video streaming.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Xiaomi 14T Pro 5000mAh 120W
(not included)
50W AMOLED
1220 x 2712
Mediatek Dimensity 9300+
Xiaomi 13T Pro 5000mAh 120W
(not included)
- OLED
1220 x 2712
Mediatek Dimensity 9200+
Oppo Reno12 Pro 5000mAh 80W
(included)
- AMOLED
1080 x 2412
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 - Energy

Autonomy

113

Xiaomi 14T Pro

230

Honor X7d (400 Smart)
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
76h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
54h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
34h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

107

Xiaomi 14T Pro

254

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

127

Xiaomi 14T Pro

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

118

Xiaomi 14T Pro

211

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

167

Xiaomi 14T Pro

218

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
98%
in 30 min
0h21
0 - 80%
0h41
Full charge
Wireless
Wireless
69%
in 30 min
0h35
0 - 80%
0h57
Full charge

Full charge

166

Xiaomi 14T Pro

224

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Power consumption and battery level during wireless full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
Time to full charge

Quick boost

169

Xiaomi 14T Pro

212

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

109

Xiaomi 14T Pro

160

Honor X7d (400 Smart)
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Xiaomi 14T Pro
5.3 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

140

Xiaomi 14T Pro

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

96

Xiaomi 14T Pro

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Xiaomi 14T Pro Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/xiaomi-14t-pro-battery-test/feed/ 0 Xiaomi 14T Pro Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless Wired Wireless
Oppo Find X8 Pro Battery test https://www.dxomark.com/oppo-find-x8-pro-battery-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/oppo-find-x8-pro-battery-test/#respond Thu, 26 Dec 2024 10:44:57 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=180951 We put the Oppo Find X8 Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key specifications: Battery capacity: 5910 mAh 80W charger (included) 6.78-inch, [...]

The post Oppo Find X8 Pro Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
We put the Oppo Find X8 Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

  • Battery capacity: 5910 mAh
  • 80W charger (included)
  • 6.78-inch, 1264 x 2780, 120 Hz, OLED display
  • MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm)
  • Tested ROM / RAM combination: 1 TB + 16 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Oppo Find X8 Pro
Oppo Find X8 Pro
155
battery
171
Autonomy
183

254

144

195

164

211

140
Charging
132

224

149

212

135

205

142

194

Key performances

Charging Time
3 days 3h
Battery life
Charging Time
0h35
80% Charging time
Charging Time
1h01
Full charging time
Quick Boost
6h46 autonomy
after 5-minute charge

Pros

  • Recovers an average 7 hours of autonomy from a  5-minute charge
  • Reaches 80% of a full charge in 35 minutes
  • Lasted more than 85 hours during our typical usage scenario

Cons

  • High residual power drains from the grid at the end of a full charge when the device is still attached to the charger

The Oppo FindX8 Pro provided a very good battery experience, with a particularly strong performance in battery life as well as good power efficiency.

Its autonomy is a very strong point for an ultra-premium product, showcasing a well-optimized device that allows users to reach more than 3 days of autonomy on a single charge if used under moderate conditions (4 hours of usage per day). In almost all scenarios, the Find X8 Pro’s battery life surpassed the average, except for 3G calls and during idle periods when only WiFi is running in the background. But in typical multimedia use cases such as video streaming in 4G or gaming, the Find X8 Pro performed strongly.

Charging the device’s large 5910 mAh battery was robust thanks to the 80W fast charger. The Oppo Find X8 Pro reached a full charge in an hour, while wireless charging took 1 hour and 40 minutes. On the downside, during a wireless charge, the UI indicated 100%, even though the device didn’t reach a measured full charge until 27 minutes later, during which 11.6% of a full charge was drained from the grid. A quick 5-minute charge provided close to 7 hours of additional battery life on average.

When charging up, the Oppo Find X8 Pro continued to consume high residual power at the end of a full charge, while the phone was still connected to the wired charger or wireless stand. Nevertheless, the Find X8 Pro’s efficiency was impressive, with discharge currents below average in all usages, indicating that the device makes the most of its battery.

Overall, the Oppo FindX8 Pro offers a top-tier performance for the ultra-premium segment, with long-lasting autonomy and good power management for its class.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Battery Charger Wireless Display Processor
Oppo Find X8 Pro 5910mAh 80W
(not included)
50W AMOLED
1264 x 2780
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Honor Magic6 Pro 5600mAh 80W
(not included)
66W OLED
1280 x 2800
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra 5000mAh 45W
(not included)
15W Dynamic AMOLED 2X
1440 x 3120
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Xiaomi 14 Ultra 5000mAh 90W
(not included)
80W AMOLED
1440 x 3200
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8GEN3

Autonomy

171

Oppo Find X8 Pro

230

Honor X7d (400 Smart)
How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Light Usage
107h
Light Usage
Active: 2h30/day
Moderate Usage
75h
Moderate Usage
Active: 4h/day
Intense Usage
47h
Intense Usage
Active: 7h/day

Home/Office

183

Oppo Find X8 Pro

254

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

144

Oppo Find X8 Pro

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

164

Oppo Find X8 Pro

211

Honor X7d (400 Smart)

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

140

Oppo Find X8 Pro

218

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Wired
Wired
70%
in 30 min
0h35
0 - 80%
1h01
Full charge
Wireless
Wireless
37%
in 30 min
1h06
0 - 80%
1h40
Full charge

Full charge

132

Oppo Find X8 Pro

224

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Power consumption and battery level during full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Power consumption and battery level during wireless full charge
The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.
Time to full charge
Time to full charge

Quick boost

149

Oppo Find X8 Pro

212

Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

140

Oppo Find X8 Pro

160

Honor X7d (400 Smart)
How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Annual Consumption Oppo Find X8 Pro
4.3 kWh
Efficient
Good
Bad
Inefficient

Charge up

135

Oppo Find X8 Pro

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

142

Oppo Find X8 Pro

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Oppo Find X8 Pro Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]>
https://www.dxomark.com/oppo-find-x8-pro-battery-test/feed/ 0 Oppo Find X8 Pro Charging Time Charging Time Charging Time Quick Boost BATTERY BATTERY Light Usage Moderate Usage Intense Usage BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless BATTERY BATTERY Wired Wireless Wired Wireless